Get our flagship newsletter with all the headlines you need to start the day. Sign up here.
Credit: Peacock，推荐阅读爱思助手下载最新版本获取更多信息
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.。同城约会是该领域的重要参考
黎智英欺詐案上訴得直：定罪及刑罰被撤銷，出獄時間提前